Typically, a template is proposed in the "Regulations on the WRC". If it is not there, then you can offer the reviewer the main content elements of the review: introduction, main part, conclusion. You could also try to contact to get them to write a review. The introduction describes:
correspondence of the work to the chosen topic;
The relevance of research.
The main part evaluates:
completeness of coverage of used literature;
the degree of validity of scientific provisions, conclusions and recommendations, their reliability;
the need and sufficiency of the diagnostic apparatus of the study;
the correctness and quality of the experimental work carried out;
quality of FQP design, attachments, presentation style;
advantages and disadvantages of work;
recommendations on the use of the results in practice.
In the final part, the opinion is expressed:
on the assessment of the work as a whole;
on the compliance of the FQP with the requirements of the educational standard and the "Provisions on FQP".
Based on this, an opinion is formed on the assignment of the appropriate qualification to the graduate.
Can I even review my thesis myself?
A graduate cannot be an official reviewer of a thesis. Therefore, you should ask for help on https://www.paytowritepaper.com/article-reviews/ if you contacted them to write a paper. Your own reviewer - this rarely happens, but it still happens. But there are situations when he has to prepare a review himself. This is both good and bad. The pros are that:
The graduate knows best the advantages and disadvantages of his research. In a review, you can draw attention to the first and disguise the second.
Writing a review is a good experience.
The main disadvantage is that research flaws can surface on the defenses and cannot be corrected. If deficiencies are revealed when reviewing FQPs by another person, they can be corrected before defense. Simply forward them and they will get on improving your thesis immediately. Thus, if it is important for a student to complete a project with high quality, then you need to look for a reviewer who will responsibly relate to his role. If a student only needs a crust, then, by prior arrangement, he can write a review himself, and then sign it with the reviewer.